?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Previous Entry Share Flag Next Entry
The Facts In The Case Of Dr. Andrew Wakefield
diversion sign
tallguywrites
A fifteen page story about the MMR vaccination controversy. As ever, I'm sure a few spelling errors have slipped past me. Feel free to point any out so I can correct them.

The reference links for the strip are in the next blog entry.

Now! Let's have a heated debate!

2013 update. Since I wrote this blog entry, this cartoon strip as well as many others on such subjects as homeopathy, chiropratic, evolution, and the supposed NASA Moon hoax landings, have been published in a book: Science Tales in the UK (Myriad Edtions) and How To Fake A Moon Landing in the US and Canada (Abrams). Here's the link to my main blog.

1 MMR Vaccination Scandal Story



2 MMR Vaccination Scandal Story

3 MMR Vaccination Scandal Story

4 MMR Vaccination Scandal Story

5 MMR Vaccination Scandal Story

6 MMR Vaccination Scandal Story

MMR 7 Vaccination Scandal Story

MMR 8 Vaccination Scandal Story

MMR 9 Vaccination Scandal Story

MMR 10 Vaccination Scandal Story

mmr 11 Vaccination Scandal Story

MMR 12 Vaccination Scandal Story

MMR 13 Vaccination Scandal Story

MMR 14 Vaccination Scandal Story

MMR 15 Vaccination Scandal Story

I am Darryl Cunningham and this is my main blog.


  • 1
Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease – and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus.

Last night the team’s leader, Dr Stephen Walker, said: ‘Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain and none are wild measles.

Here's A LINK http://www.nationalautismassociation.org/press0053106.php

Of course it all came to squat - why? nobody knows.
pro vaccine says the research was flawed - or ANOTHER complete fabrication.
anti says his funding was cut.

P.S.
The original MMR strain that Wakefield did a CASE STUDY on (I agree taken completely overboard by newspaper sensationalism) was PULLED from the market (quietly) and REPLACED with a SAFER American version almost certainly because of a faulty mumps component (also in singles mumps vaccine)

In a happy ending maybe the vaccine industry published this fact and the public regained their confidence and everyone lived happily ever after. Fat chance. Instead they put Deer on the case. Best known for blowing apart drugs that have already been taken off the market, knowing nothing about medicine and paying "teams of people" from thin air apparently to fine comb through case studies that conclude a vaccine needs more research.
More money for WAkefeild? Not exactly, he spent the Law case money on his next paper. It's documented.

Was a similar test done on NT children without bowel disease? You know, as a control group? If not, the study is incomplete, and this conclusion would be a classic case of 'post hoc ergo propter hoc'. Logical fallacies have no place in science.

  • 1